Talk to an SDS specialist+48 453 584 042Monday to Sunday, 08:00–22:00 CET
CLP · classification and labelling

How is a mixture classified under CLP?

Classification follows a hierarchy: data on the mixture, bridging principles where applicable, and component-based methods. Each hazard class must be assessed separately.

01

Define the mixture

Fix composition, ranges, form and properties.

02

Select relevant evidence

Mixture tests and component data have different scope.

03

Use the correct method

Limits, additivity and bridging depend on the hazard class.

04

Assess each hazard

Physical, health and environmental hazards require separate decisions.

05

Document the rationale

Record sources, assumptions, exclusions and approval.

In practice

Method example

For an acidic mixture, review SCLs, final properties and available tests before deciding corrosion or irritation.

Checklist

Complete formula
Hazards assessed separately
SCLs verified
Method justified
Label derived

Common mistakes

×adding all H-statements together
×using one method for every hazard
×ignoring mixture data
×confusing proposal with approval
Practical questions

Frequently asked questions

Is a CAS number sufficient?

No. Concentration, form, quality and the whole mixture matter.

Can bridging principles always be used?

No. Applicability depends on the evidence and hazard class.

Does a general answer validate a specific product?

No. The actual composition, form, supplier data and intended use must be assessed.

Who should approve the result?

A competent person should review the data, method and internal consistency before supply.

Primary sources

Check the current consolidated version and the exact substance or product scope before use.

Turn knowledge into a process

Organise evidence before opening generation.

Prepare sources, formulations and review ownership in a separate English workspace.

Create an accountTalk to us+48 453 584 042