Discuss your Australian SDS project+48 453 584 042Online support · daily
Australian WHS guide · expert review required

Build Section 2 from approved Australian classification evidence.

Section 2 communicates a classification result. It should not guess hazards from a product name, CAS number or a foreign document without product-specific assessment.

Direct answer: Keep GHS 7 classification, label elements and Section 2 synchronised.

01

Collect product-specific inputs

Use formulation, physical form, properties, tests, ingredient data and intended use for the actual Australian product.

02

Apply the Australian GHS 7 basis

Record every endpoint decision, rule, input and reviewer rather than storing only final hazard statements.

03

Generate label elements from one record

Signal word, pictograms, hazard statements and precautionary communication should match the approved classification.

04

Check connected sections

Composition, first aid, fire response, exposure controls, properties and toxicology should not contradict the hazard summary.

05

Escalate uncertainty

Missing acute toxicity estimates, unstable formulation data or unclear physical state should stop release and create a review question.

EX

Practical example

A solvent blend is entered with concentration ranges and flash-point evidence. The engine calculates candidate hazards, but a reviewer approves Section 2 only after reconciling supplier data and the mixture result.

Release checklist

  • Confirm exact formulation
  • Record endpoint decisions
  • Match label elements
  • Check connected sections
  • Name the approver

Common mistakes

  • Copying Section 2 from a similar product
  • Treating a CAS match as finished classification
  • Publishing contradictory label and SDS text

Frequently asked questions

Can AI decide Section 2 alone?

No. It may assist organisation, but product-specific evidence and competent review are required.

Must Section 2 match the label?

They should be driven by the same approved classification record.

Can supplier classifications differ?

Yes. Differences require evidence review rather than automatic majority voting.

What if data are missing?

Keep the gap visible and block release until it is resolved or properly assessed.

A controlled next step

Turn the guide into a controlled Australian workflow.

Create an Australian account or discuss your Australian product portfolio.

Create an Australian accountTalk it through+48 453 584 042